Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
MINISTER FOR RURAL and Community Development Heather Humphreys has said she is consulting with the Attorney General about how a ban on the XL Bully would work in Ireland in a speech addressing the Seanaid this afternoon.
Humphreys said she has also asked former Deputy Garda Commissioner, John Twomey, to chair a Stakeholder Group that will look at “what further actions we can take around strengthening policy and legislation on dog control”.
“I think having a former Deputy Garda Commissioner in charge of that group sends a very clear message about how serious I am about strengthening our enforcement on dog controls,” she said.
Humphreys said that one of the key issues being prioritised is that of restricted breeds.
“I want to talk specifically about the XL Bully,” she said.
“The XL Bully is a cross-breed of the American Bully and is already covered by the restricted breeds list. I believe we need to go further,” she said.
“I am consulting with the Attorney General on how a ban on the XL Bully would work in Ireland and what legislative changes may be required to give effect to this – that work is underway.”
She said she has asked the Stakeholder Group to look at examples of legislation around the breed in countries like Denmark, the UK and France, which have implemented similar bans.
She said the ban of the XL Bully in the UK has been the subject of a judicial review, “so it’s important we get this right”.
“I know some people will not like hearing this today,” she said. “They will tell me that they own an XL Bully and it would never hurt anybody. I can’t ignore the facts.
“We all love our dogs but no dog’s life is worth more than human life.”
Humphreys has said that the Government does not intend to oppose a Private Members’ Bill put forward by Senators Erin McGreehan, Robbie Gallagher, Eugene Murphy, Micheál Carrigy, Malcolm Byrne and Diarmuid Wilson, calling for further dog controls.
Advertisement
This move comes after the death of 23-year-old Nicole Morey in Limerick last Tuesday, after she was attacked by her own pet XL Bully dogs.
“I want to extend my deepest sympathy to the family and friends of Nicole Morey,” Humphreys said, while also referencing an attack on Alejandro Mizsan, a young boy attacked by an XL Bully in Wexford last year.
Speaking on his way into Cabinet this morning, Taoiseach Simon Harris said he would like to see the taskforce conclude its work as quickly as possible.
“This work needs to happen in an expeditious manner. I think of Nicole Morey and her family, and extend my sympathies and condolences to her at this most tragic and traumatic time for them. But there is a clear need for government auction in relation to this,” said the Taoiseach.
Harris said his initial view is that the breeds should be banned, but said he is happy to hear from the taskforce, stating that it’s important to listen to them.
There is currently an XL Bully ban in place in the UK, where it’s a criminal offence to own an XL Bully unless you have a valid exemption certificate.
However the breed is restricted in Ireland, alongside Staffordshire, American and English Bull Terriers, Dobermans, German Shepherds, Japanese Akita and Tosa, Rottweilers, Rhodesian Ridgebacks and Bull Mastiffs.
An XL Bully ban is due to come into effect in Northern Ireland and Humphreys said she believes the Government should be in line with policy in north of the border.
There is currently no register for restricted dog breeds in Ireland, so we don’t know how many XL Bully dogs are in the country.
XL Bully dogs were banned by the UK government as it said that they have been “disproportionately” involved in dog attack deaths in recent years.
The UK XL Bully ban was introduced in October 2023 – the government received over 60,000 license applications before the law was implemented.
The dogs are highly muscular, and are the result of inbreeding by breeders.
Restricted dog breeds in Ireland must be muzzled in a public space, kept by someone over 16 who is able to control them, walked on a strong short leash, and be wearing a collar with the owner’s name and address at all times.
With reporting by Christina Finn and David Mac Redmond
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
137 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Well my fluffy is different. He is so gentle and sits when I tell him too sometimes. And I bring it for loads of walks nearly one a month. I love looking tough when I walk down the street because I am over compensating for many things in my life.
@Leinsterprincess: Too bad for you, if you read the countless Bully XL attacks all over the world, the owners said the same thing: “Oh, my fluffy is different, he’s around the kids and he never attacked anyone”, but once these dogs bites, their jaw lock and it’s lethal. Society’s interest goes above the love for your dog, and I hope they are banned.
Great idea! But really…. If this comes into law, how will this be enforced? There is no enforcement for dog licenses, poo littering and irritating ongoing dog barking. Additionally, I recently learned that for any action against a negligent dog owner, the garda, ISPCA and local dog warden must work in tandem. Really, how likely is this… And furthermore, if any of us are having issues with neighbour and their dog… We must lodge a complaint with the district court. What a joke… Laws born to fail… Laws that can eventually cause neighbourhood feuds.
This weekend went in the park with children and at the entrance to the playground a man was seating on the ground with a dangerous dog unmuzzled. Not only children were afraid to pass by but even adults. And absolutely NOTHING can be done in such situations and never will. In some other country maybe but never here.
@Sergej Simonov: I said it to a guy who had two dogs in the flipping swing area of the playground. He was straight in my face threatening to kick my head in. I certainly wasn’t getting in a fight with him in front of all the kids. The dogs were the smaller pitbulls,not a mussel in sight.
@Mindful Muinteoir: a list doesn’t make a dog dangerous. A dangerous dog is all on how an owner treats their dog. I have a big breed (not a banned or restricted one) and people automatically think he is dangerous, he isn’t, he loves when people come to say hi and gets very excited. Because he has been treated right!!!!
Have all the laws you want, whose going to enforce? I’ll be a dog warden, it seems to be a cushy number. In common with a lot of public sector jobs, there is a job description and there is the role, which appear to be two different things.
I’m not usually in favor of bans but there is a strong case here.
What you need is enforcement of laws for the its-the-owners-not-the-breed brigade who think the laws dont apply to them and their dog would never!! So many owners don’t/won’t get it !
@Notty Tee: I have the scars on my hand and leg after being bitten by a Jack Russell,I have the scars on my neck and back after being bitten by a German Shepherd as a 9 year old kid..so speaking from my own experience,I would say seriously “Yes.”…
@Will Q: exactly and well said .any dog can do serious damage . Yes agreed with other people’s comments on larger dogs but if you were in my shoes with a child that was bitten on the face by a so called friendly family dog and your son needed plastic surgery and almost lost an eye you would understand that all dogs can bite.
Why anyone would want such dogs as ‘pets’ is beyond me, and you know you’re in trouble when getting the Police to shoot them is the only way to calm them down. They should be banned straight away, and anyone found keeping these dogs should be locked up.
Now that you mention it, surely there are some ways to restrain a dog like this? Tasers, maybe. Tranquillisers.
I reckon it’s a seriously bad idea to have fully armed Guards going around, especially if they’re supposed to take an attacking dog off a child. Way too risky to be firing at a loose animal.
@The Firestarter: people buy these dogs for the wrong reasons but why are all the dogs being painted with the same brush and the responsible dog owners being punished? Dogs aren’t born bad, stupid humans make them that way.
Extreme inbreeding of animals should be banned altogether for both pets & farm animals. It’s bad both for the animals and for the general public. Also, we have to do something serious about anti-social behaviour. Thugs now rule the streets.
I owned a staffie and he was an extremely affectionate dog, which is common for the breed. I would never leave him alone with a child though or own four of them. XL bullys seem like a really extreme version which nobody needs to own.
@Thesaltyurchin: agree in the most part but some dogs are just not meant to socialise like some people. Out for a walk recently and a beautiful bully dropped his ball and ran towards my 12 yr old springer I could see he was friendly and wanted to play but he was young and they get up in older dogs faces who don’t like it so they give out and bark. Well, the bully owner was so aggressive. Her fell should have been on a lead and muzzled but wasn’t but if had to muzzle would be her not the dog!
@Thesaltyurchin: “Never the dog” would you give me a break. There’s a reason Pit Bull Terriers, Japanese Tosas and Dobermann Pinschers must be muzzled in Ireland and it ain’t the owners. It’s the innate, inherent, aggressive nature of these animals that render them unpredictable and highly irascible and thus unsafe to be unmuzzled around the soft, tearable flesh of a human child.
@Etcher: Nope, it’s the genetics of why their bred, for most blood dogs, it’s in their ‘nature’ to chase rats, badgers, etc… not to eat someones face ffs. I will change my statement as it was slightly misleading… almost never the dog ALWAYS the owner. Here’s a link from the internet (maybe try using it properly sometime) “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Bully
@Thomas Sheridan: That’s what should happen, but we prefer the reactive path of least resistance, so, low ebb unenforced legislation it will be. Unless the two above M0r0ns have their way!.. dogs will stand trial or somesuch.
@Lydia Mcloughlin: people like that shouldn’t be allowed dogs, because that dog was friendly, too much time with her when he gets older he won’t be. Don’t ban breeds, people who want to buy dogs need to get a license and do a training course, simple. I have a big breed dog (not restricted breed) would be more than happy to do anything necessary to keep them. Then you can weed out the people buying the dogs for the wrong reasons versus genuine dog lovers.
@AnthonyK: are you a bit thick? You actually want to ban all dogs? For what purpose? Absolute madness, how entitled are you that you think my dog is somewhat inferior to you?
Mandatory MUZZLES for the dog’s on the list. Be a Responsible dog owner…don’t regret and suffer the consequences of a hurt child or person. Its Not worth the chance.
Why are the current laws not enforced, I see these dogs out all the time with no mussle on. If they can’t enforce ac simple law like that what chance do we have of then enforcing a ban. These are dangerous dogs and if they get hold of you there is little chance you get away with no serious life changing injuries.
Even poodles attack people unless they are properly trained by their owners. I’ve seen many larger dogs when in France on bike paths and forest areas… Dogs there are very well behaved, they do what the owner says, sit still based on hand signals. Quite a lot of dog owners also do that in Ireland which is great but there are always those who shouldn’t own dogs at all
@no no no: Some breeds, like the XL Bully, are unpredictable and overly aggressive by their nature. You could be the best dog owner/trainer in the world and it wouldn’t change the fact that these particular breeds could turn on you, or others, at any time. They are not ‘pets’ and absolutely should be banned.
Small amendment should be added , any owner of any dog responsible to clean the roads,parks front of any shop.
Or implement DNA test for the sh. It ! Fines are good
Banning dogs when the current laws are not enforced is again more lip services from this government. I am lucky enough to live with a German shepard, most affectionate and at times gentle dog in the world. However he is always kept on a lead when out around others and even at home when young children are around. I understand what he is capable of and as such I keep him exercised, stimulated and engaged. If you are considering getting a dog on the restricted breed list please ensure you will have ample time to provide your dog the same. As a dog person I would like to see services such as ISPCA and local dog wardens sufficiently funded and staffed before banning certain breeds.
@Nick O’Halloran: Eh, Animal Health and Welfare Act 2013, Welfare of Greyhounds Act 2011, Greyhound Racing Act 2019, Dog Breeding Establishments Act 2010 and Control of Horses Act 1996? All have provision for fines and/or jail time.
I’m the owner of a staffie, he is licenced, micro chipped,DNA tested, insured and always on a restricted lead and muzzled when I’m out with him. It’s not rocket science,be responsible for it’s the dog that will suffer in the end.
@Fifi Ryan: Then I don’t expect anything else. Fair play, enjoy your Dog. Other owners however don’t give a poodle about such responsibility and they are not happy this is even being discussed. They are one’s that you should be really peeved with imho.
I’d say have an exemption for rescued dogs. Natural attrition would phase them out, because rescues are always spayed or neutered first.
And obviously muzzle them in public places and have them on a strong lead with an adult holding them. But I’d hate to think we’re as bad as the UK and would put down someone’s pet for no reason. Bad enough we’re supposed to pay a TV licence even if we don’t have a television. Why not draw a line and ban future XLs, then register any existing pets as restricted breed?
@Jimmy Wallace: No they don’t! You can train a Labrador to kill a person just as easy to train it to be a guide dog! It’s the human behind the training that’s the problem!
My Boxer was attacked on two separate occasions by two different chocolate coloured labradors one was off its lead and the other came out of its house and attacked as I was walking by. A lot of this comes down to owners and how responsible they are. Dogs should not be off leads no matter what breed they are, and should be secured in the property. There should also be a cap on how many you can own.
@daragh harmon: Sorry to hear, boxers are lovely dogs. I think the legal issues here are based on the fact that thankfully an adult could take their medium dog out of range, where with an XL bully dog, there’s no controlling them.
Mute he didnt take the 120k because he already got it s
Favourite he didnt take the 120k because he already got it s
Report
Jun 11th 2024, 4:25 PM
A month ago the govt released ads “if your dog bites someone its not your dogs fault, its yours, if your dog attacks someone its not your dogs fault, its yours, now they are blaming the dog
This gov are able to make and implement rules when it suits them so why do they need to consult anyone?.Certain dogs are a danger to society so ban them. How many more people need to be torn apart or killed before Humphries gets off her backside?
I’m sure there are very nice xl bully’s but in my own opinion they are still to close to being fighting dogs not pets. Still breeding good fighting dogs with good fighting dogs. I’m sure for years if there were any that were to nice they were killed. The killing just hasn’t been bred out of them yet
Ahhh, prime example of the wokism cancel culture at its very best. If it cant be controlled lets just ban it and im not just speaking about the xl bully but the uneducated, unelected leader of this soft country had the cheek to say that multiple types of dogs should be banned. Nah, sorry, not gonna happen
Ah, that’s going a bit far. Dogs are playful animals. They have a lot of restraint and self-control when raised properly and sociably. They understand a lot of normal cues. They normally have loads of options before getting to a point where they show, or use their teeth, even on another dog. We’re all forgetting here that some human beings are the most dangerous mammals walking the earth. We don’t muzzle tall people who haven’t done any harm!
People blaming the owners and taking responsibility are half correct. Many owners of these dogs, from my observation, tend to be less than model citizens that I would not trust with a dog but it has to be said that the breed of dog are horrifically dangerous. I have no doubt that not every Golden Retriever oowner can’t train their dogs very well but it is rare (if ever) that they savage somebody and kill them. These digs are dangerous. Some as that.
We can already see, with Britain, it just drives that which is already half underground (garden shed test-tube puppy making), deeper underground.
They didn’t even allow owners a means of storing reproductive product (because that is half the reason most people own them. The cash-in-hand, off-the-books, breeding business). They could have said “register dog, collect&store semen/ova, free to sell abroad, but not in UK, then licence/surrender”.
Britain did establish one good system though – prohibiting the passing on of dogs to other persons by gift or otherwise. So criminals can’t have mammy register the dog, then take it to illegal dog fights. Nor can they intimidate anyone into taking over ownership.
Article quote:
“There is no register for Restricted Dogs in Ireland” – what sort of half-arsed mickey mouse job was that?!
Fer jaysus sakes lads.
Un-be-ducking-lievable.
That should be called the “non-restriction of unrestricted restricted dog breeds” law.
I knew something didn’t compute a few years ago when I was jumped up on and fully mouthed on the forearm, repeatedly, by a young German Shepherd and the owner didn’t apologise or see a problem with it.
Thanks to a brain injury, I hadn’t retained applied knowledge of the restrictions, much less acceptable young dog behaviour across various breeds. But instinctively knew something wasn’t ‘normal’, or ‘right’ – this wasn’t mere excusable youthful exuberance.
Now I know why – that breed should have been muzzled to begin with. Especially if the “jumping on stangers” lesson hadn’t even been learned yet.
Luckily, I have no fear of dogs. And even with full knowledge restored now, I would still have no problems with being ‘mouthed’ by a youngster. So long as that youngster **is** in training and *is* being appropriately disciplined after the act. What I have no tolerance for is feckless neglectful clueless owners who reject the fact that they *must* establish a hierarchy with their ‘domesticated WOLF’.
That they are Master.
That they and their families eat first, dogs later. Not simultaneously. And not as a result of begging.
A dog is not a bunny, for kissing and cuddling.
Nor should a dog be treated as an equal, like a cat.
A cat is both predator, and prey, like a human.
A dog (wolf) is predator, only, and the prey of none.
Perhaps the most apt article of the week on this topic, is the one in the Limerick Leader.
It is the PSI, of any creature, that should count when it comes to restrictions and bans and especially in the establishing of the “defining characters/confirmation for legislative prohibition or regulation”, rather than the squabble over whether a cross breed fits the restricted/banned breed parameters.
The Pounds Per Square Inch of bite pressure.
Surely this is the point of sole concern.
I expect the IMO and Medical Professionals would completely agree.
If it bites like a Shark, like a Lion, like a Tiger…
..then obviously it cannot co-exist with humans and lifestock in their daily/living environments.
And that’s before we touch on the probable neuro-behavioural problems of the unpredictable XL Bully psycho’ “flipswitch”.
With immediate effect, XLs should be in a *double* harness. They should be controlled at the chest, where all their muscle is, with a vest-lead harness. So that the walker can throw their entire weight to the ground behind the Bully and control pull on the chest with two hands.
This in addition to a dual muzzle-lead to turn their head towards dog walker.
And an obligation to carry pepper or citrus spray to force release of a bite.
All this should be enforceable, with National microchip registration, with immediate effect in a temporary emergency law. As a test, a trial run, from which pros and cons can be deciphered for a path towards total breed extinction in 20 years (end-of-life for this year’s pups currently in utero).
And anyway, since there is no obligation to register in Ireland, and no unified National Microchip system, how would you even find a banned, or restricted, breed in Ireland, to ban it or call it up for aggression assessment/handler training&testing or to enforce neutering&spaying/a breeding moratorium or prohibition?
Utter stupidness!
Compel registration on a National Register first.
Then discuss calling Restricted breeds up for aggression testing with Garda-ISPCA teams. Like a “licenced dog NCT”, or suspending/banning breeding, or manditory control equipment for each restricted breed (because, fyi, muzzles **cause** madness!! Muzzles should be for Sharks and Lions only. Based on PSI. And/or based on outcome of bi-annual canine NCTs)
Let’s also be clear here.
We don’t even know if Nicole Morey was an accident or a DV *murder*?
They shot the dog, without examining it’s behaviour, or having historic knowledge. Was the dog consistently triggered by all people at that entry point to the home? By women? By certain commands? By running/jogging/fast moving mammals? Or just the typical XL Bully flipswitch to psycho’ mode?
XL Bullies can be unleashed on command or control of a DV partner. For example. Not just criminals or drug dealers intimidating people.
While probably not the case with Nicole, the fact is a DV partner could train an XL to attack if 1 person is leaving the property on their own (i.e. fleeing a DV situation). A Bully could be trained to prevent a victim fleeing the property on their own, as much as they could be trained to attack people entering a property.
So if we’re gonna ban anything.
Start with who should definitely never own restricted dogs – those with a history of any form of violence or criminal aggression. Domestic violence, sexual violence, criminal record, anti-social behaviour etc. Maybe even a Psychological temperament test for possessing and controlling a lethal weapon.
A dog, like a child, will naturally manifest what it witnesses. Not just what it is ordered or told or trained or conditioned to do. The difference with a higher intelligence species – a human – is that a human can empathise with a victim and self-learn opposing (opposite) behaviours to the aggressor.
We shouldn’t be so surprised by the lackluster attitude to Restricted Dogs in Ireland.
Afterall, following a number of gun-related Famicides, the FFG Government **and Garda Harris himself**, reassured the public that there were “such” enormously restrictive protocols for gun owners, and everyone was sooo safe.
Then we get 2 incidents of people running amok with guns, **on cocaine**, in public forests ffs!
Where is the obligatory piss test and breathalyser in the local Garda Station, before the local Garda Station releases your gun to you for legitimate hunting, from the bunker buried locker under the Garda Station for all the guns of local licenced gun owners?
They need to be banned, it’s a pity they were ever created…. I absolutely love dogs… and I can understand how heartbreaking it will be for anyone who owns one and has spent a fortune on it to be annoyed and upset especially if they look after their one and have no issues. However we can’t ignore the capacity these dogs have to kill.. they are similar to lions walking around….and very threatening for anyone walking by them. I have seen lots of young people under the age of 16 walking them and struggling to control them on the lead. I have never seen of these dogs with a muzzle. They should all be wearing muzzles when brought for a walk and should not be accompanied by a child, should be an adult with them.
Welcome back Chief Shill Corrigan. You have been very quiet as SF tanked in the recent elections. Did your employers in Belfast order you to keep quiet on here?
Highlight bad owners and educate owners, not condemn the breed of dog .. Owners who want a restricted breed should apply for a special licence, let home checks and education be part of that process.
@John Doe: do you not get it, the breed IS INHERENTLY DANGEROUS. If you do not understand that, Google it, it’s free. There is no training for these animals; its like trying to train a lion not to attack humans. It is in their DNA. Their genetics tells them to attack, maim and kill. End off. Please educate yourself on that. It’s all available on the internet for free.
‘Political death’: The EU Parliament fake jobs scam that has cost Le Pen her 2027 presidency bid
4 hrs ago
16.7k
98
UNWRA
Gaza rescuers say they recovered 15 bodies after Israel fire on ambulances
15 mins ago
17
Dublin
Mother and son face losing home after change to tenants scheme
22 hrs ago
69.8k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say